Skip to main content

Policy Changes Could Unlock Significant New Housing Potential for Faith-Based Organizations

Faith-based organizations such as churches, synagogues, and mosques can play an important role in addressing California’s housing shortfall by leveraging underutilized land that they own. A new policy brief from the Terner Center, titled Mapping the Potential and Identifying the Barriers to Faith-Based Housing Development, shows that approximately 38,800 acres of religious institutions’ land – equivalent to the size of the City of Stockton – could potentially support new housing development, including in some of the state’s highest-cost counties.

Much of the land is located in neighborhoods with lower poverty rates and greater educational, economic, and environmental amenities and, to a lesser extent, near transit. The research shows there are opportunities to support the goals of faith-based organizations as they grapple with the best use for their underutilized land and make progress towards California’s goals in building more housing, expanding access to opportunity, and reducing commute-related greenhouse gas emissions.

However, the authors urge that state and local policy action is needed to overcome the land use, financing, and capacity barriers facing faith-based organizations.

^ Map of City of Oakland Potentially Developable Parcels of Religious Land with Single-Family Zoning Overlay

The report outlines three key policy recommendations that would put faith-based organizations in a stronger position to build on their land:

  • Revise local parking requirements and relax density limitations to allow for greater flexibility in building housing on religious-owned lands. Two pending proposals in the California legislature propose similar solutions: AB 1851 eliminates replacement parking requirements for religious organizations while SB 899 allows for all-affordable housing on both religious and medical non-profit property at a minimum density and through a by-right approval process if it meets specific requirements;
  • Improve existing financial assistance to catalyze development on underutilized land owned by faith-based institutions, particularly by creating preferences for LIHTC-funded developments on religious lands in higher-resourced neighborhoods;
  • Expand technical assistance for navigating the housing development process to specifically target the needs of faith-based institutions.

Read the full policy brief here.

Related Articles

Rebuilding after the Los Angeles Fires: What California Can Do to Facilitate Recovery

As people in the Los Angeles region undertake the task of rebuilding, the complexity of the effort is heightened by…

San Francisco Chronicle Op-Ed: “Newsom just quietly floated an idea that could help fix California’s housing and fire recovery crises”

Managing Director Ben Metcalf writes in an Op-Ed for the San Francisco Chronicle that while considerable attention has been paid…

What We Can Expect on Housing Affordability from President Trump in 2025

Author: Ben Metcalf At President Trump’s election night speech, he highlighted the broadened electoral coalition that propelled him to victory,…

How much can new housing contribute to state climate action?

Author: Zack Subin Because solutions to the climate crisis are both urgent and unprecedented in scale, climate policy researchers routinely…