Skip to main content

Building Local Institutional Capacity: Lessons Learned from the Emergency Rental Assistance Program

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, jurisdictions across the country made disparate choices as they distributed federal emergency rental assistance to tenants and landlords. A new paper Building Local Institutional Capacity: Lessons Learned from the Emergency Rental Assistance Program draws on interviews with dozens of stakeholders to understand how local institutional and nonprofit capacity shaped decision-making around the design of Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) programs.

Interviewees point to the ways that local governmental capacity and existing relationships, expertise, and capacity of local nonprofits and other potential partners were key determining factors in ERA implementation. The magnitude of resources available through ERA and the tremendous need to send out rental assistance quickly spurred expansions in  local institutional capacity—at least temporarily—particularly through staffing, cross-jurisdictional and partner collaborations, and improved technological infrastructure.

The paper also highlights key lessons to improve the implementation of future emergency response efforts, particularly through better infrastructure for responsive communication between local and federal agencies, additional funding for administrative staffing and capacity-building, and development of off-the-shelf applications, portals, and reporting systems. The findings also point to steps to advance longer-term systemic reforms to improve local administration of ongoing federal assistance programs  more broadly.

The analysis builds on the findings of a previous report published in the spring, which assessed where pre-existing economic hardship, pandemic-related employment impacts, and limited local institutional capacity could be hindering efforts to ensure emergency rental assistance is reaching eligible renters.

Read the full report on our website here.

This paper is published as part of the Housing Crisis Research Collaborative, which aims to address the long-standing inequities in access to safe, stable, and affordable rental housing that have been laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Collaborative is led by a group of research partners at Urban Institute, the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, the NYU Furman Center, and the Terner Center.

Related Articles

Implications of Further HUD Staffing Cuts on the Housing Sector

Author: Ben Metcalf Recent reporting suggests that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is facing sweeping layoffs,…

Rebuilding after the Los Angeles Fires: What California Can Do to Facilitate Recovery

As people in the Los Angeles region undertake the task of rebuilding, the complexity of the effort is heightened by…

San Francisco Chronicle Op-Ed: “Newsom just quietly floated an idea that could help fix California’s housing and fire recovery crises”

Managing Director Ben Metcalf writes in an Op-Ed for the San Francisco Chronicle that while considerable attention has been paid…

What We Can Expect on Housing Affordability from President Trump in 2025

Author: Ben Metcalf At President Trump’s election night speech, he highlighted the broadened electoral coalition that propelled him to victory,…