Terner Center Blog: No Limits

Highlights from the James R. Boyce Affordable Housing Competition Studio Symposium

Posted on by Carol Galante

As the number of individuals and families experiencing homelessness remains at troubling heights, particularly in high-cost regions, planners, architects, and developers are working to confront the crisis with innovative design, financing, and construction methods.

Through the James R. Boyce Affordable Housing Studio course—generously funded by a gift from CED alumni James R. Boyce (M. Arch. ‘67) and co-taught by David Baker and Daniel Simons of David Baker Architects—Carol Galante, Faculty Director of the Terner Center and the I. Donald Terner Distinguished Professor of Affordable Housing and Urban Policy in the College of Environmental Design, connects students from a variety of backgrounds to the leading ideas in the field. In teams of architects, planners, and other real estate professionals, the students completed a collaborative final: the development, financing, and design of a comprehensive affordable housing project, with some component focused on homelessness.

On May 2nd, 2018, the instructors hosted a symposium to mark the end of the course, offering students the opportunity to present their final projects and receive feedback from a panel of judges made up of experts in the field. The symposium also featured a panel discussion We Can Do This: Solving the Crisis of Homelessness, moderated by Professor Galante and offering ways that affordable housing professionals can help alleviate the crisis.

We Can Do This: Solving the Crisis of Homelessness

The day began with presentations and a panel discussion with California-based practitioners working to combat the affordable housing and homelessness crisis. In her opening remarks, Professor Galante described the urgent need for high-impact solutions: “After I named this panel ‘We Can Do This,’ one of my fellow panelists called me up and said ‘That seems audacious.’ So, I’ll start by saying, I named it this because we have to do this.”

That sentiment was echoed in the presentations of the practitioners, many of whose work was used as precedent-setting case studies for the students in the course. Angela Brooks, FAIA, Managing Principal at Brooks + SCARPA in Los Angeles, showed examples of her firm’s permanent supportive articulated how integral good design, driven by residents themselves, is to changing lives and breaking stereotypes. Brad Wiblin, Senior Vice President at BRIDGE Housing, spoke about the role of developers to rapidly expand the supply of affordable housing built while also utilizing partnerships with other organizations to provide high quality property management services and ensure long-term support for tenants. David Baker, FAIA, Principal at David Baker Architects and a co-instructor of the CED studio course, discussed how modular construction can streamline and speed production. Finally, Tomiquia Moss, Chief Executive Director of Hamilton Families, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that works to end family homelessness, contextualized the conversation with the direct services, funding strategies and systemic changes that her organization emphasizes to rapidly rehouse and prevent homelessness in the first place.

A video of the panel discussion is available here.

Student Presentations

After a networking lunch, the student groups had the chance to present their proposals for affordable housing developments sited on two potential infill lots, one in San Francisco’s South of Market neighborhood and the other in Downtown Oakland.

South of Market San Francisco Developments

600 Jessie

by Ali Mills, Malen Leon Farrera, Miao Li, James Perez, and Kristin DeMarco

600 Jessie is a mixed-use project that seeks to provide 260 units and supportive services for low-income adults, including artists, and transitional aged youth, as well as space for market rate retail and office space for organizations focused on connection with the surrounding Filipino community.

Gateway on Mission

by Sean Doocy, Paige Dow, Kevin Gao, and Michael Marks

Gateway on Mission will house a diverse mix of populations, leveraging partnerships with existing nonprofits to provide services to residents and utilizing modular construction to speed up the development timeline.

Keystone Commons

by Cynthia Armour, Julie Mendel, Weinan Huang, and Yang Liu

Keystone Commons will provide a total 263 affordable housing units, with units dedicated to veterans and transitional-aged youth.

Downtown Oakland Developments

The Ebell

by Matt Fairiss, Fang Fang, Fiona Ruddy, and Matt Turlock

Inspired by the values of the Ebell Women’s Club, the Ebell is a supportive housing development for 79 pregnant women and families with children under five experiencing homelessness.

Lakeside Collective

by Brian Goggin, Can Ge, James Conlon, and Xiaoyu Ma

Seeking to comfortably house greater numbers of people than traditional affordable housing projects, Lakeside Collective is a 380-unit, 560-bed housing development with a mix of small studios and dorm-style units.

The Beacon

by Shiyuan Chen, Erin Lapeyrolerie, Mercedes Harris, Megan Stenftenagel, and Christiana Whitcomb

The Beacon is a mixed-use development with 240 units of 100% affordable housing—some for formerly incarcerated individuals, some rental units for families, and some for-sale, income-restricted condominiums as well as spaces for resident services and commercial spaces.

The two winning projects:
Keystone Commons

the Ebell

Congratulations to these two groups and to all the students who participated in the course! The studio represents a unique opportunity for students across departments to marshal their different skill sets in order to find better ways of designing and building affordable housing. The results of the competition showcase the innovation made possible by cross-collaboration.

Why We Need a New Conversation on Rent Control in California, Today.

Posted on by Carol Galante

Leaders seeking to address California’s housing crisis are facing an important challenge: how to take meaningful and significant policy action to “stop the bleeding” of rising costs, eviction and displacement without generating new challenges that will only prolong the state’s deep affordability challenges. Today’s debate over rent control, and particularly, the movement to repeal Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act (which places statewide limits on how jurisdictions implement rent control), has pushed this challenge to the fore. One side of the debate is working to qualify a measure on the November ballot that would fully repeal Costa-Hawkins, enabling localities to expand rent…

A ‘Safe Haven’: Resident Stories Convey the Benefits of Affordable Housing

The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) has become the most important funding source for affordable housing development in the United States, producing nearly 3 million housing units since its inception in 1986 and housing over 13 million people. Despite its significance in the housing market, relatively little research has been undertaken to document and understand the experiences of residents living in LIHTC-funded properties. Today, the Terner Center is releasing a new study addressing this research gap. Our analysis sheds light on how living in LIHTC properties impacts low-income residents, particularly with regard to housing stability, economic mobility, and access to…

Renting the Dream: The Rise of Single-Family Rentals

Posted on by Carolina Reid, Carol Galante, Rocio Sanchez-Moyano

Tenants living in single-family homes in the United States represent the fastest growing segment in the housing market today, but neither academic literature nor public policy has kept pace with their growing importance. Today, the Terner Center is releasing a new study seeking to better understand this group of renters, the homes and neighborhoods they occupy, and the policies that might better support their success. Our study presents data on single-family renters living in a range of housing markets across the country. Our first question: why has this market segment grown so fast? In short: a boom in single-family home…

It All Adds Up: The Cost of Housing Development Fees in Seven California Cities

Posted on by Sarah Mawhorter and David Garcia

In the summer of 2017, the Terner Center embarked on a seemingly straightforward task: determine the amount and type of fees levied on new residential development in seven California cities. What was initially thought to be a clear assignment turned into an odyssey of combing through difficult-to-obtain fee schedules, cobbling together piecemeal information across city departments, and repeatedly interviewing various city planning officials. The onerous and lengthy process our research team faced tells the story of the development fee process in California. While fees act as an important tool to mitigate the effects of new construction, the development and administration…

Perspectives: Practitioners Weigh in on Rising Housing Construction Costs in San Francisco

Posted on by Carolina Reid and Hayley Raetz

It is no secret that producing new housing in California is an expensive endeavor. Our Cost of Building Housing Research Series recently launched with the goal of understanding why this is the case, breaking down the elements of the housing development process to identify key cost drivers and potential private and public sector solutions. Today we are releasing our first brief of the series, which examines rising housing construction costs in San Francisco from the perspective of non-profit and market-rate housing developers, architects, and other practitioners on the ground. The brief shares findings from a series of interviews and focus…

Announcing New Terner Center Series: The Cost of Building Housing

Posted on by Terner Center for Housing Innovation

In recent years, the housing affordability challenges faced by high-cost regions have gone from bad to worse. A number of factors, including shrinking public subsidy, explosive job growth, wage stagnation, and a severely constrained supply of housing have all been widely cited as drivers (with each region facing a unique set of circumstances). Another factor that is compounding the housing affordability issue is the actual amount of money it takes to build a housing unit. In recent years, the cost of building has skyrocketed in places like San Francisco - in some cases increasing by up to 50 percent -…

ADU Update: Early Lessons and Impacts of California’s State and Local Policy Changes

Posted on by David Garcia

A multi-pronged approach to alleviating the shortage of housing in California and other high-cost regions is urgently needed. As we have discussed in past research, Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) - built with a small footprint predominantly in under-utilized single family neighborhoods - can offer much needed naturally-affordable supply to the market. In the fall of 2016, the California State Legislature passed a set of bills intended to clear the way for the proliferation of ADUs  in California. Even before these changes were adopted, many leaders at the local level were pioneering policies to make it easier for residents to build…

New State Policies Aim to Boost Access to Opportunity through Housing

Posted on by Elizabeth Kneebone and Carolina Reid

In California, the Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) plays an important role in determining where and how Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) get allocated for the production of affordable housing. On Wednesday, TCAC adopted a series of policy changes aimed at increasing the development of affordable housing options for families in higher opportunity communities, signaling a commitment to advancing fair housing goals amid the state’s broader agenda to address California’s housing crisis. The regulations seek to respond to a growing body of evidence that communities that provide low-income families access to good schools and safer, lower-poverty, and less segregated…

A Reform Proposal for the Federal Housing Administration

Posted on by Carol Galante

Media reports and other sources in Washington, D.C. suggest momentum is building for housing finance reform. According to a recent piece in National Mortgage News, “the White House and congressional GOP are eyeing a tight window between tax reform and the 2018 midterms to pass housing finance reform. And with key policymakers readying their exit, the effort could be the most concerted push yet.” As policymakers debate the future of the nation’s housing finance system, I urge them not to overlook both the importance of the Federal Housing Administration and the improvements it needs in order to fulfill its mission and…